top of page

The Leadership Reality Check of 2026

  • Writer: Glenn Wallis
    Glenn Wallis
  • May 28
  • 3 min read

Nearly half of senior leaders are considering leaving leadership altogether.


Not the tired ones. Not the underperformers. The experienced, capable leaders who built careers doing this, and who are now quietly wondering whether it's worth it.


That number should stop every board and every HR director in their tracks. It isn't.


At Exigence we work with leaders at exactly the moment this question becomes live: when the pressure has outpaced the support, when the authority has shrunk but the accountability hasn't, and when the gap between what's expected and what's possible has become impossible to ignore. 


Three themes are coming up in almost every conversation right now.


The burnout crisis is structural, not personal


The root cause of leadership burnout isn't weakness or poor resilience. It's a design problem. Organisations are excellent at launching initiatives and notoriously poor at stopping them. 


Responsibility grows. Authority shrinks. The list of competing priorities lengthens with no corresponding reduction in expectations, and leaders absorb the gap.

The most underused tool I see? The "stop doing" list. Not as a personal productivity hack but as a genuine leadership discipline - a regular conversation with your team about what to deprioritise, what to drop, and what's consuming energy without creating value. Most leaders have never had that conversation explicitly. The ones who do are markedly less overwhelmed.


At an individual level, coaching creates the space to untangle competing pressures, gain clarity, and build a forward plan. Not as a remedial intervention. As a performance one.


Your humanity is the competitive advantage AI can't replicate


Almost every organisation is investing in AI. The ones seeing the best results aren't the ones deploying the most tools. They're the ones where leaders have doubled down on the fundamentally human parts of leadership that no algorithm will replace.

Curiosity. The ability to read a room. Building trust through a difficult moment. Knowing what's blocking your people and caring enough to remove it. These aren't soft skills. They're the capabilities that determine whether strategy lands or dies in implementation.


Leaders don't need to be engineers. But they do need enough AI literacy to make credible decisions and ask the right questions. The useful reframe is this: think less about AI versus human, and more about intelligence capital. 


What are you doing to optimise the quality of both the human and artificial intelligence you're bringing to bear on your challenges?


A practical starting point: do a personal SWOT with an AI lens. Where are your distinctly human strengths, and where are you applying them most deliberately in the spaces AI genuinely can't reach?


The credibility gap is closer to home than most leaders think


Only around 10% of leaders have an accurate sense of how their behaviour is actually experienced by the people around them. That's not a criticism. It's a structural problem. Without regular, honest feedback, the gap between intention and impact widens invisibly.


This matters more than it sounds. If you don't know where you're having a positive effect, you can't double down on it. If you're unaware of unintended consequences, you can't course-correct. And, in multigenerational teams, where different cohorts bring genuinely different expectations about communication, recognition and the nature of work itself, the margin for assumption has never been smaller.


The solution isn't a personality transplant. It's closing the gap between your intention and your actual impact, and making targeted adjustments based on real data rather than self-perception. 


Structured feedback, whether through a formal 360 process or honest one-to-one conversations, is the starting point. Acting on what you learn is what builds credibility.


The common thread


Burnout, AI disruption and the credibility gap look like three separate problems. In practice, they share the same root: leaders who are under-supported, under-informed about their own impact, and operating without the clarity and intentionality the moment demands.


The leaders doing best right now aren't waiting for certainty. They're taking stock honestly, making deliberate adjustments, and investing in their own development with the same rigour they'd apply to any other business priority.


If any of this resonates, and I suspect it will if you're leading a team right now, that recognition is your starting point.


At Exigence, we blend strategic sharpness with unmatched coaching depth. We help ambitious organisations turn people capability into strategic advantage. Through practical coaching, real-world diagnostics, and scalable leadership solutions, we move your business forward.


 
 
bottom of page