top of page

Two Intelligences: A Leader's Playbook for AI

Writer: Glenn Wallis
Glenn Wallis
Oct 11
3 min read

Most leaders don't need convincing that AI matters. What they need is a clearer picture of where it actually creates value, and where it doesn't.


Here, we break down the shift from AI-as-a-productivity-tool to AI-as-strategic-capability, with practical takeaways on redesigning workflows, protecting what makes your organisation distinctive, and building governance in from the start rather than bolting it on after the fact.


A huge thank you to Justine Whitaker, whose insights on our recent Impactful Conversations podcast episode helped shape the thinking in this article.


Move past productivity


Drafting emails and summarising documents are useful, but they're baseline wins, not transformation. The bigger prize is the intelligence economy: simulations, predictions, and testing multiple hypotheses at a pace that hasn't been possible before.


Try this: Ask what decisions could be made better, not just faster.


Match the tool to the task


Using a top-tier large language model version to draft a routine email is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Leaders need to get good at task visualisation, working out what deserves your best AI and what doesn't.


Try this: Audit where your teams use AI today. You might be using the wrong tool for the job more often than you think.


Redesign the work first


Research by SAP and Oxford Economics found that well over half (64%) of organisations studied, have brought in AI agents at differing levels of deployment, but only 3% feel they are fully prepared. Interestingly, very few redesigned their workflows. That gap is where value leaks away. An already messy process just gets automated faster.


Try this: Revisit core workflows with the people who run them, before rolling out new tools. Strip out what's redundant.


Decide what stays human


You can either let AI take what it can and see what's left for people, or identify your distinctive capability first and ring-fence it. Neither is universally right, it depends on your sector and maturity.


Try this: Get clear on what makes your organisation genuinely different, then decide how AI amplifies that.


Build in governance, don't bolt it on


"AI made me do it" won't satisfy a regulator or a board. Watch for two biases too: over-trusting AI because it sounds authoritative, and being unforgiving the moment it makes a mistake that we'd excuse in a colleague.


Try this: Name who's accountable for AI-driven decisions, and put it in writing.


Get comfortable with constant recombination


The balance between human and machine tasks needs revisiting continually, not once every 18 months.


Try this: Set up a standing forum whose job is to keep re-examining that split.


Build capability by doing


Classroom training doesn't build AI fluency. Working through real problems, testing outputs and comparing results across models does.


Try this: Give teams space to experiment with AI on real work, not simulations.


Three steps to take this week


  • Bronze: find one trusted AI commentator and follow them consistently.

  • Silver: spend at least an hour a day on hands-on experimentation.

  • Gold: keep an eye on frontier model developments, including cost, openness and hosting, since they signal choices you'll need to make later.


The bottom line


The organisations that get ahead will redesign workflows thoughtfully, protect what makes them distinctive, and treat adaptation as a habit rather than a project.

Share your thoughts below, subscribe for more evidence-led insights, and pass this article on to those shaping the next generation of leaders.


At Exigence, we don't train leaders - we coach them, at scale, to become the person others naturally want to follow. It's behavioural psychology, not box-ticking, and it's how we help ambitious organisations turn AI-era pressure into real leadership growth.


bottom of page